Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I think there would need to be a way to also list transactions > which are "in progress" -- this would include not only live > transactions, but also all those transactions that have actually > committed but are not yet listed as committed because their > position in the commit sequence has not been determined. That might allow the same data to serve both needs with one or two fewer timestamp (or similar) columns that what my post of a few minutes ago suggested. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
