On 31 August 2012 07:59, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30 August 2012 20:05, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> None of this new code kicks in for non-security barrier views, so the >>> kinds of plans I posted upthread remain unchanged in that case. But >>> now a significant fraction of the patch is code added to handle >>> security barrier views. Of course we could simply say that such views >>> aren't updatable, but that seems like an annoying limitation if there >>> is a feasible way round it. >> >> Maybe it'd be a good idea to split this into two patches: the first >> could implement the feature but exclude security_barrier views, and >> the second could lift that restriction. >> > > Yes, I think that makes sense. > I should hopefully get some time to look at it over the weekend. >
Here's an updated patch for the base feature (without support for security barrier views) with updated docs and regression tests. Regards, Dean
auto-update-views.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
