On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:12:52AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 09/04/2012 10:49 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012: > >> > >>>And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade. > >>><http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=pitta&dt=2012-09-04%2003%3A00%3A05&stg=check-pg_upgrade> > >>Great, thanks. > >> > >>Who's going to work now on porting the shell script to Perl? ;-) > >Well, we require Perl for development, but not for usage, at least not > >yet. There was talk of needing Perl for doing standby pg_upgrade, but > >there were too many concerns about that idea. > > > This is a test script, not what you should use in production. I > don't see any reason why we shouldn't require Perl for running the > standard test.
Oh, I thought he was talking about the scripts pg_upgrade creates for users to run. Sorry. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers