This is really late, but ...

On 08/21/12 11:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Our sinval synchronization mechanism has a somewhat weird design that
makes this OK.

... I don't want to miss the change to thank you, Robert, for the detailed explanation. I have backported b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4 to 9.1.3 and it is working well in production for ~2 weeks, but I must admit that I had put in the unnecessary read barrier into SIGetDataEntries just to be on the safe side. I will take it out for the next builds.

Thanks, Nils



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to