On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> That makes sense to me. The reason I didn't make that change when I > added the serializable special case to pg_dump was that it seemed > like a separate question; I didn't want to complicate an already big > patch with unnecessary changes to non-serializable transactions. > If we agree, should we change that now ? Thanks, Pavan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
