Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié sep 12 11:21:36 -0300 2012: > A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch > that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because > our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that > restriction is particularly useful and should be lifted. I'm not saying > we should let anyone be an author, but within the pool of committers, I > think we should let the mechanics of the git tools determine these > fields.
+1. I had the same problem. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
