OK I will redesign the function. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Best regards, Etsuro Fujita > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:and...@dunslane.net] > Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 2:27 AM > To: Dimitri Fontaine > Cc: Tom Lane; Etsuro Fujita; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: add (PRE|POST)PROCESSOR options to COPY > > > On 09/13/2012 01:20 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > >> I think it would be a lot better if this were designed so that the > >> processor programs executed on client side. Which would probably make > >> it not a COPY patch at all, but something in psql. > > And pgloader, which already has a part of that feature with the per > > column reformating facility. > > > > Yeah, I'd be inclined to say that pre/post processing of this kind is > really a job for specialized clients. > > cheers > > andrew > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
