Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
> I've been slowly continuing to work that I started last winder to make
> XLogInsert scale better. I have tried quite a few different approaches
> since then, and have settled on the attached. This is similar but not
> exactly the same as what I did in the patches I posted earlier.
This sounds pretty good. I'm a bit bothered by the fact that you've
settled on 7 parallel-insertion slots after testing on an 8-core
machine. I suspect that it's not a coincidence that you're seeing
a sweet spot for #slots ~= #CPUs. If that is what's happening, we're
going to want to be able to configure the #slots at postmaster start.
Not sure how we'd go about it exactly - is there any reasonably portable
way to find out how many CPUs the machine has? Or do we have to use a
GUC for that?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
