As part of the PostgreSQL Development process, we agreed that everybody that supplies a patch would also review a patch. Doing that gives the process balance and avoids focusing on particular individuals for review. It's Peer Review, not Free Review.
In Sept 2012 review process we have 5 people doing more reviews than patches and 14 people who've submitted more patches than reviews. From that list, I've excluded 7 people who've submitted their first patch (or at least I don't recognise the name) and who can be forgiven for not signing up, yet. I myself haven't put down to review anything yet, but this mail is part of me thinking about that. There are still 35 patches in need of review. We must remember that if we don't do this then the alternative is simply longer delays in the patch acceptance process and that affects developers worse than anyone else. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
