Dne 26.09.2012 17:29, Alvaro Herrera napsal:
Excerpts from Tomas Vondra's message of mié sep 26 12:25:58 -0300
2012:
Dne 26.09.2012 16:51, Jeff Janes napsal:
> I think forking it off to to another value would be better. If
you
> are an autovacuum worker which is just starting up and so getting
its
> initial stats, you can tolerate a stats file up to
> "autovacuum_naptime
> / 5.0" stale. If you are already started up and are just about to
> vacuum a table, then keep the staleness at PGSTAT_RETRY_DELAY as
it
> currently is, so as not to redundantly vacuum a table.
I always thought there's a "no more than one worker per database"
limit,
There is no such limitation.
OK, thanks. Still, reading/writing the small (per-database) files would
be
much faster so it would be easy to read/write them more often on
demand.
Tomas
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
