On 1 October 2012 14:05, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Browning <d...@kavod.com> wrote: > I'm wondering if there are any technical/standards constraints that > are behind the fencing behavior. If there aren't any, maybe an opt-in > keyword might do the trick -- WITH UNBOXED foo AS (..)?
I may be mistaken, but I think that the fence is described in the SQL standard. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
