On 1 October 2012 14:05, Merlin Moncure <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Browning <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm wondering if there are any technical/standards constraints that > are behind the fencing behavior. If there aren't any, maybe an opt-in > keyword might do the trick -- WITH UNBOXED foo AS (..)?
I may be mistaken, but I think that the fence is described in the SQL standard. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
