Peter, all, * Peter Geoghegan (pe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Well, I'll point out once again that the argument about its stability > is invalid, because we serialise the entries to disk. If a point > release changes the representation of the query tree such that the > hash values won't match, then we have no recourse but to bump > pg_stat_statements version number, and invalidate all existing > entries.
What if we simply included the pg_stat_statements version number in
what's shown to the user as the 'hash'? ver#.hash ?
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
