El 03/10/2012 21:38, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escribió: > > Does anyone have an objection to this? I can imagine cases where the > check would reject values that would get accepted at runtime, if the > type's input function was sensitive to the phase of the moon or > something. But it doesn't seem very probable, whereas checking the > value seems like an eminently useful thing to do. Or maybe I'm just > overreacting to the report --- I can't recall any previous complaints > like this, so maybe entering a bogus initcond is a corner case too.
I guess a wrong initcond value, probably is a pilot error. So, my first reaction is +1 to make it an error. But if you feel there a corner cases maybe at least a warning -- Jaime Casanova 2ndQuadrant: Your PostgreSQL partner
