2012/10/8 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Julien Tachoires <jul...@gmail.com> writes:
>> About \ds behaviour, I think to add 2 columns :
>> - 'LastValue'
>> - 'Increment'
>
> That would make the command a great deal slower, since it would have to
> access each sequence to get that info.  I don't object to adding such
> columns to \ds+, but I don't think it's a good idea to put them in the
> basic command.

Ok.

> The other problem you're going to have here is that there is in fact no
> such command as "\ds" (nor "\ds+"); rather, it's a special case of
> \dtsvi.  As such, putting any relkind-specific info into the result is
> problematic.  I think you're going to have to invent a different command
> if you want there to be sequence-specific columns.

Yes, that's why I plan to create a new function listSequences() and
call it from src/bin/psql/command.c :
+       /* \d* commands */
+       else if (cmd[0] == 'd')
+       {
...
+                       case 's':
+                               success = listSequences(pattern, show_verbose);
+                               break;

Cheers,


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to