On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Anything in contrib that can be built seperately from the server code, > > > > that just requires libpq and headers, should be pulled and distributed as > > > > seperate modules, which has the added benefit that, if listed on GBorg, > > > > search engines will pick up the modules ... > > > > > > > > And the whole arg that someone threw out about 'nobody maintaining them if > > > > they aren't part of the distribution' ... so? if nobody is maintaining, > > > > then who is using?? > > > > > > Want to hear something funny? They are moving my pgmonitor off gborg > > > and into the pgaccess. When the move is final, I will add a link on > > > that gborg page. > > > > Ah, so now if I want to use pgmonitor, I have to use pgaccess? guess that > > is one way to sell pgaccess to the masses *shrug* > > They are moving pgaccess more into the admin role, and pgmonitor fit in > with that.
Personally, I kinda like to be able to run admin modularized ... they *should* be looking at stuff like webmin, where you can plug-n-play admin functions as required, or horde (http://www.horde.org) ... why would I install pgaccess if all I want to do is monitor? Now, to be able to install pgaccess and have pgmonitor tie into *that* would be cool ... 'bigger is better' is MicroSloth's philosophy ... sounds like the PgAccess guys are adopting it too? :( ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
