On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> writes: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> Also, do we want to centralize the definition of pg_strdup() in /port, >>> or leave each module to define it on its own? > >> +1 for a centralized definition. > > The difficulty with a centralized definition is that it's not clear that > the error path is or should be *exactly* the same for all these usages. > I see at least six variants right now. While some are gratuitous, > some of them are tied into local conventions of each program. > > regards, tom lane
Is it possible to at least standardize on one for the front-end and one for the back-end? Then we can use those two going forward and sort out all these other usages and get them to conform to one of the aforementioned definitions over time. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
