Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Not sure how it is cleaner when we have to have trigger stuff hanging > around to make one object pretend to be another. That also creates a > chain of dependency which puts this into the future, rather than now.
Yes, that part isn't cleaner at all. The part where we have a separate Object to deal with I like better, and I tried to reconciliate the two view points. Note that the event trigger would come installed and disabled, the user would only have to activate it: ALTER EVENT TRIGGER distribute_my_cluster ENABLE; Still the same issue. > The goal is make-sequences-work, not to invent something new that > might be cooler or more useful. If we create something new, then we > need to consider the references Daniel described, but that is a whole > different thing and already accessible if you need/want that. So ok, I withdraw my consensus proposal. I tried. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
