On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:18:48AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Please see downthread -- there is some commentary from Noah ([1] and > others) about the patch itself. As far I understand, some changes are > still needed, and I don't know if the last version submitted is the > version that should be backpatched.
We'd best use the same patch for both HEAD and back branches; pg_upgrade would carry forward faulty indexes. pg_upgrade could instead invalidate them, but I don't think the gravity of the problem calls for it. A release note suggesting a REINDEX of affected indexes ought to suffice. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
