Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Kevin Grittner escribió: >> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> Also, it doesn't appear that we ever got around to preparing >>> documentation updates, but I think we definitely need some if >>> we're going to start throwing errors for things that used to be >>> allowed. Since Kevin has the most field experience with this >>> problem, I'd like to nominate him to write some docs ... >> >> OK, will do. The "redo the DELETE and RETURN NULL" workaround is >> not at all obvious; we should definitely include an example of >> that. > > Any chance this patch could be pushed soon? > > The problem is that this patch conflicts rather heavily with my FOR > KEY SHARE patch. I think it makes sense to commit this one first. > > To me, it would be good enough that the code changes go in now; the > doc patch can wait a little longer.
Sorry I just got to this in wading through backlog. Will push today without docs and work on docs soon. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
