all gone ...
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > Who the hell are these people and why can't they configure their > own MTA? > > Vince. > -- > ========================================================================== > Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net > 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking > http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com > http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com > ========================================================================== > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: 15 Aug 2002 16:47:22 -0000 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ic.kharkov.ua. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 192.204.191.242 but sender was rejected. > Remote host said: 550 5.0.0 Go away, your mailserver is broken > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 62268 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 16:46:47 -0000 > Received: from dialup44.kharkov.ukrpack.net (HELO dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua) >(212.1.112.156) > by mail.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 16:46:47 -0000 > Received: from dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua (DUAL [172.16.200.1]) by >dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version >5.5.2448.0) > id Q926YA3A; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:46:07 +0300 > Received: by dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua (Microsoft Exchange Connector for POP3 >Mailboxes 4.50.2113) with SMTP (Global POP3 Download) > id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:45:56 >+0300 > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 61671 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000 > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 61668 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000 > Received: from postgresql.org (64.49.215.8) > by mail.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000 > Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) > by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP > id 419EF47654E; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:48 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) > by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP > id A2668475F2D; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) > by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE137475974 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:44 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (adsl-67-36-71-182.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net >[67.36.71.182]) > by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCB8947594D > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:43 -0400 (EDT) > Received: (qmail 55151 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Aug 2002 16:38:45 -0000 > Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:45 -0400 (EDT) > From: Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > PostgreSQL-development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 > Precedence: bulk > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a > > > > trailing '@', so here is a patch that implements that. It has the > > > > advantages of: > > > > > > Probably because not everyone saw it. I know I didn't. This entire > > > issue is growing more and more complex. How about a configure item > > > to not even compile it in? Or better yet, a configure item to put > > > it there with the default off. > > > > I think I am prety close, and I don't see a configure flag as any better > > than a GUC option that is off by default. > > But how many people would even use it? I can't see adding the bloat > unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on. Am I wrong > and really alot of people actually want/need this? > > Vince. > -- > ========================================================================== > Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net > 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking > http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com > http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com > ========================================================================== > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
