On Monday, November 05, 2012 7:33 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I'm not sure what to do with this patch. There was some resistance to > the idea originally; then after some discussion, there was some > apparent agreement that it might be useful on occasion. Later, a patch > was posted, but there was almost no review of it; except to say that it > should probably be reworked on top of an hypothetical, future XLogReader > feature. > > Since it doesn't look like we're going anywhere with it soon, I'm going > to close it as returned with feedback. Hopefully, if we get XLogReader > in 9.3, we will have time to rebase this patch on top of that. (I > invite Amit to give Heikki's version of XLogReader patch a look.)
The patch for which Heikki has given comment (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=897) is already moved to next CF. This was not related to XLogReader. However as there is not much interest in this feature, so it is okay. > (It is very hard to track down vague references to old threads that > aren't properly linked in new threads. Please make sure to reply to old > emails, or at least to give Message-Ids or URLs when starting new > threads. I am replying to one message of each old thread here.) My mistake, I am sorry for that and I shall try to take care for future work. With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers