On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 13:18, Neil Conway wrote: > That said, I _personally_ don't see the need for more than one or two > replication implementations. You might need more than one if you > wanted to do both lazy and eager replication, for example. But you > certainly don't need 5 or 6 or however many implementations exist at > the moment.
Fair enough. Thank you for offering a complete explanation. You're argument certainly made sense. I wasn't aware of any single serious effort underway which sought to finally put replication to bed, let alone integrated into the core code base. Sign, Greg Copeland
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part