David Fetter <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:04:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should we be doing something
>> about such cases, or is playing dumb correct?
> The SQL standard handles deciding the behavior based on whether WITH
> CHECK OPTION is included in the view DDL. See the section 2 of the
> SQL standard (Foundation) for details.
Ah, I see it. So as long as we don't support WITH CHECK OPTION, we
can ignore the issue.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
