On 2012-11-12 10:19:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2012-11-10 16:24:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> If any of this stuff were getting used by external modules, changing it > >> would be problematic ... but fortunately, it isn't, because we lack > >> support for plug-in rmgrs. So I'm not worried about back-patching the > >> change, and would prefer to keep the 9.x branches in sync. > > > XLR_BKP_BLOCK_* might be used by things like pg_lesslog and its surely > > used by xlogdump. Not sure if either are worth that much attention, but > > it seems worth noticing that such a change will break stuff. > > Hm. Okay, how about we leave the old macros in place in the back > branches?
Sounds good to me. The RestoreBkpBlocks change seems unproblematic to me. If anything its good that it has been renamed. Thanks, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
