Robert Haas escribió: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Amit kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> I think I can see all of those things being potentially useful. There > >> are a couple of pending patches that will revise the WAL format > >> slightly; not sure how much those are likely to interfere with any > >> development you might do on (2) in the meantime. > > > > Based on above conclusion, I have prepared a patch which implements Option-1 > > I wonder if we shouldn't make this a separate utility, rather than > something that is part of pg_resetxlog. Anyone have a thought on that > topic? That thought did cross my mind too. -- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
