Bruce Momjian escribió: > It is possible that the poor 16k pg_upgrade value is caused by the poor > 9.2 binary-upgrade number (189.38). Perhaps I need to hack up > pg_upgrade to allow a 9.3 to 9.3 upgrade to test this.
Hmm? This already works, since "make check" uses it, right? -- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
