On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 15 November 2012 19:16, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So what's next here? Do you want to work on these issue some more? >> Or does Jeff? I'd like to see this go in, but I'm not sure I have the >> bandwidth to do the legwork myself. > > I'll take another look. No elegant solution immediately occurs to me, though.
The overflow was trivial to fix. The only concern I had was about the behaviour after it did the special case. I didn't want it to keep doing the math and trying to grow again a little bit every tuple. I think I was leaning to putting the magic flag back. The alternative is to only do the one-off grow if we can grow at least some arbitrary percentage like 10% or something like that. But it seems like a lot of arithmetic to be doing each time around for probably no gain. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
