Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: >> pg_temp-toindex.patch >> Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
> But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_NNNN > something. How should that be indexed? We do <replaceable>NNNN</> in a lot of places, and that seems serviceable enough, at least in output formats where the NNNN can be rendered differently from plain text. I don't remember though whether the sgml index infrastructure allows markup in an index item. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers