Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I think at least wal_sender_timeout and wal_receiver_timeout are also > problematic.
I looked at those and didn't see a problem --- what are you worried
about exactly?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
