On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 00:13 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:

> My mistake...I thought we were more concerned about the cost of
> locking.
> 
> I agree, locking many data pages simultaneously could be hazardous.
> 
> This requires more thought.Maybe removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE isnt such a
> great idea after all...

As I said elsewhere in the thread, I'm not planning to introduce any
additional locking. There is already precedent in IndexOnlyNext.

Regards,
        Jeff Davis




-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to