On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The following comments still talk about "key and value", thus need
> an update:

Oops.

> This comment needs updated (s/comparator/compare/, and also add
> has_heap_property and arg):

Fixed.

> I would suggest to add prefixes to struct members, so bh_size, bh_space
> and so on.  This makes it easier to grep for stuff later.

OK.

> Do we really need the struct definition be public?  Couldn't it just
> live in binaryheap.c?

Well, that would preclude defining any macros, like
binaryheap_empty().  Since efficiency is among the reasons for
inventing this in the first place, that doesn't seem prudent to me.

Another new version attached.

P.S. to Abhijit: Please, please tell me the secret to getting five
people to review your patches.  I'm lucky when I can get one!

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment: binaryheap-rmh3.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to