I have found an odd mistake in pg_upgrade 9.2, though I don't think it
is a problem.  Specifically, pg_upgrade will copy a visibility map (vm)
>1GB extent file from the old cluster to the new, even if the
crash-safety of the old vm file does not match the new server.  For
example, 19323_vm would not be copied, but 19323_vm.1 would be.

I don't think this is a problem because having a >1GB vm file would
require the table to be 64TB (1GB * 8 * 8k), and our max table size is
32TB.  I am not planning to fix this in 9.2;  this code is restructured
in git head and does not have this problem.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to