Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, I know one of Marc's goals is to have libpq as a stand-alone > tarball, but I thought we decided that this _didn't_ require it to be in > a separate CVS repository.
Removing libpq is impossible since psql, pg_dump, etc all depend on it. > I don't think we should judge libpqxx differently than the other > interfaces just because it is new. The fact that it is new is a strike against it, and the fact that it is not integrated is a bigger strike against it. I think we should move out libpqxx and libpq++ now, and also perl5 if we are going to put DBD::Pg on gborg rather than in the main distro. We want to ensure there is a level playing field for libpqxx and DBD::Pg. jdbc and odbc should be moved if and only if their maintainers want it. I'm not in a hurry to move the rest; they're small and don't generate a lot of CVS traffic. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster