On 2012-11-29 15:03:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > The other interesting question remaining is what to do about the rm_desc > > function in rmgr.c. We're split between these two ideas: > > Why try to link rmgr.c into frontend versions at all? Just make > a new table file that only includes the desc function pointers. > Yeah, then there would be two table files to maintain, but it's > not clear to me that it's uglier than these proposals ...
Seems more likely to get out of sync. But then, rmgr.c isn't changing that heavily... I still prefer the -DFRONTEND solutions, but once more, its only a slight preference. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
