On 12/03/2012 04:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> Is there anything to be gained *now* from merging those two concepts? >> I saw that as refactoring that can occur once we are happy it should >> take place, but isn't necessary. > > IMO it's a net loss in robustness of the autovac implementation.
Agreed. That's only one aspect of it, though. From the other point of view, it would be a proof of stability for the bgworker implementation if autovacuum worked on top of it. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
