On Nov 26, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Although my intuition would be [], the existing concatenation-like > aggregates return null for no input rows, so this probably ought to be > consistent with those. This annoys me at times, but I wrap such calls in COALESCE() and forget about it. So I agree to keep it consistent with other array-returning aggregate functions. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
