Dimitri Fontaine escribió: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Well, there's certainly a point, because IIUC Dimitri's patch dumps > > the file into the pg_dump output no matter whether the file originally > > came from an SQL command or the filesystem. IMHO, anyone who thinks > > that isn't going to break things rather badly isn't thinking hard > > enough. > > Only if you ask for it using --extension-script. The default behaviour > didn't change, whether you decide to install your extension from the > file system or the PostgreSQL port. What happens on a normal pg_dump of the complete database? For extensions that were installed using strings instead of files, do I get a string back? Because if not, the restore is clearly going to fail anyway. I mean, clearly the user doesn't want to list the extensions, figure which ones were installed by strings, and then do pg_dump --extension-script on them. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
