On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Grittner > <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > > >> That makes sense to me. The reason I didn't make that change when I >> added the serializable special case to pg_dump was that it seemed >> like a separate question; I didn't want to complicate an already big >> patch with unnecessary changes to non-serializable transactions. >> > > If we agree, should we change that now ? >
Sorry for posting on such an old thread. But here is a patch that fixes this. I'm also adding to the next commitfest so that we don't lose track of it again. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
pg_dump_readonly_xact.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
