Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote:
>> Making the user fix it seems much more sensible to me. Otherwise I
>> suspect we'll find users who get strangely surprised when they can
>> no longer find any trace of an expected index in their upgraded
>> database.
> Or preserve it as-is.
To do that, we would have to add an option to CREATE INDEX to create it
in an invalid state. Which is stupid...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
