On 2012-11-26 21:45:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I gather that this is supposed to be back-patched to all supported > > branches. > > FWIW, I don't like that patch any better than Robert does. It seems > as likely to do harm as good. If there are places where libpq itself > is leaving entries on the error stack, we should fix them -- retail. > But it's not our business to clobber global state because there might > be bugs in some other part of an application.
As there hasn't been any new input since this comment I am marking the patch as "Rejected" in the CF application. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
