Hi Noah, On 2012-12-08 09:06:01 -0500, Noah Misch wrote: > We're entering the last planned week of the CF. Apart from a 72-hour period > in mid-November, some CF has remained in-progress continuously for the last > 176 days. With 64 out of the 82 current patches unresolved, we're on track to > again see no gap between CF 2012-11 and CF 2013-01. The process as practiced > today is a shell of its former self[1][2]. Authors, reviewers, committers: > has the process changed to something better, worthy of formally replacing its > predecessor? Or, rather, do we need a fresh process correction?
I agree that lately there seems to be minimal benefit of the commitfest process. I don't see many disadvantages either, but... No idea how to fix that, it seems most people are simply swamped with work and stuff. I made a pass through most of the commitfest entries to update their state to something sensible and where it seemed necessary inquired the newest status. Not sure thats really welcome, but it was the only thing I could think of helping to make some progress. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
