On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:13:30AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 12/08/2012 11:01 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On 2012-10-15 17:13:10 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>On 10/13/2012 10:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>>On 09/17/2012 10:01 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote: > >>>>On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Joachim Wieland <j...@mcknight.de> > >>>>wrote: > >>>>>Attached is a rebased version of the parallel pg_dump patch. > >>>>Attached is another rebased version for the current commitfest. > >>>These did not apply cleanly, but I have fixed them up. The combined diff > >>>against git tip is attached. It can also be pulled from my parallel_dump > >>>branch on <https://github.com/adunstan/postgresql-dev.git> This builds and > >>>runs OK on Linux, which is a start ... > >>Well, you would also need this piece if you're applying the patch (sometimes > >>I forget to do git add ...) > >The patch is marked as Ready for Committer in the CF app, but at least > >the whole windows situation seems to be unresolved as of yet? > > > >Is anybody working on this? I would *love* to get this... > > > > > > > I am working on it when I get a chance, but keep getting hammered. > I'd love somebody else to review it too.
FYI, I will be posting pg_upgrade performance numbers using Unix processes. I will try to get the Windows code working but will also need help. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
