On 12/8/12 9:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm tempted to propose that REINDEX CONCURRENTLY simply not try to > preserve the index name exactly. Something like adding or removing > trailing underscores would probably serve to generate a nonconflicting > name that's not too unsightly.
If you think you can rename an index without an exclusive lock, then why not rename it back to the original name when you're done? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
