On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>> That would solve the consistency problem, yes. Would we need a special >>> kind of permission for this? I would say superuser/database owner only? > >> Yeah, I doubt we would need a whole new permission for it, but it >> would certainly have to be disallowed for ordinary users. > > Giving up the ability to run pg_dump as a non-superuser would be > pretty annoying, so this would have to be an optional feature if we > restrict it that way.
Yeah, for sure. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
