Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated
>> display is not
>> particular useful.
> Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production
> use. It might actually be more useful if it's truncated in in the
> other end (keeping the last 30 instead of the first 30 chars)
+1 for truncating from the left. I think pg_upgrade already does that
in its progress messages.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
