Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Discussing this makes me realise that we need a more useful response
> than just "your data is corrupt", so user can respond "yes, I know,
> I'm trying to save whats left".
> We'll need a way of expressing some form of corruption tolerance.
> zero_damaged_pages is just insane, much better if we set
> corruption_tolerance = N to allow us to skip N corrupt pages before
> failing, with -1 meaning keep skipping for ever. Settable by superuser
> only.
Define "skip". Extra points if it makes sense for an index. And what
about things like pg_clog pages?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
