On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:28:00AM +0400, Groshev Andrey wrote: > > > 18.12.2012, 05:22, "Bruce Momjian" <br...@momjian.us>: > > This is the first pg_upgrade mismatch report we have gotten about 9.1. > > I have asked the reporter for details. > > > > Is what is the full 9.1 version number? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> # rpm -qa |grep postgres > >> postgresql90-devel-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql91-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql90-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql90-server-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql91-libs-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql91-server-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql91-devel-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql90-libs-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql90-contrib-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> postgresql91-contrib-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 > >> > > Full version ? It is not full postgresql91-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 or I do > not understand something? > I installed latest postgresql from the repository http://yum.pgrpms.org
Oops, I see that now, sorry. I wanted to make sure you were on the most recent 9.1 version, and you are. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
