On 24 December 2012 16:25, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 12/24/12 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > >> I wonder if you're having a hardware problem? > > > Always possible. I didn't report this until I had replicated the crash and > seen exactly the same thing twice. I've seen it crash on this assertion 6 > times now. Bad hardware is not normally so consistent.
Consistency in bugs is a wonderful thing, so I figure we can immediately rule out the hardware. > I kicked off another test that includes the block number just before Tom > suggested it, so I should have the block by tomorrow at the latest. The > range of runtime before crash is 3 to 14 hours so far. Tom will have fixed it by then ;-) Sorry, I should have mentioned it was the block number that I wanted and that was why I suggested using the other print function. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
