On 1.1.2013 17:35, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> There was an earlier suggestion by Andres Freund to use memcmp()
> instead, but I don't see that in the latest posted version of the patch;
> was there a specific rationale for taking it out or it was just lost in
> the shuffle?
No, I've tried that approach with a comparator like this:
static int
rnode_comparator(const void * p1, const void * p2)
{
return memcmp(p1, p2, sizeof(RelFileNode));
}
but it turned out to be slower than the current comparator. I've posted
some benchmark results and possible explanation on 20/12 (message
50d26fe8.1040...@fuzzy.cz).
If you could verify my results, that'd be great.
Tomas
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
