KaiGai, * Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote: > IMO, only "parser" should accept command types except for ALL but > raise an error something like "it is not supported yet" to protect from > syntax conflicts.
Right, I agree with this.
> Right now, I plan to submit a revised patch with the syntax support
> above, and without support for INSERT or NEW of UPDATE checks,
> as minimum set of functionality for v9.3.
Sounds good.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
